Claims And Issues

WHO IS "HER" AS IN "HER DUTIES" IN DRAFT XO?

In earlier articles, here and here, we explored other questions about the draft Executive Order dated December 16, 2020 to seize the voting machines that were used to elect President Biden, Download Draft Executive Order dated December 16 2020.   We looked at the question of why the draft XO is written for the Secretary of Defense but not the Attorney General, and why it is written for the National Guard but not the Army.  We learned that the answer is the same in both cases:

Because they wouldn't do it.

          But there are more questions, including today's question:  Who is the person who would be appointed Special Counsel with full resources "necessary to carry out her duties" after the voting machines were seized?  And why did they need a Special Counsel after they seized the voting machines?

          They may have needed to appoint a Special Counsel because the Attorney General wouldn't do it.

          So let's explore the appointment by this order of a Special Counsel with all the resources "necessary to carry out her duties[.]"  These people never used "her" or "she" meaning to be inclusive of everyone, and it is unlikely that they started on "December 16, 2020."  This crowd would not be likely to talk about "her" unless they had a woman already in mind.

          One of their lawyers at the time would have been a natural to fill the Special Counsel job this document would make.  At the time, one was Cleta Mitchell and another was Sidney Powell.

          Two weeks after the XO was written, Cleta Mitchell was on the January 2nd telephone call when the former guy called Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to try to intimidate him and his Office to overturn the election in Georgia.  

          Sidney Powell was another lawyer they had available at the time.  Sidney Powell filed many lawsuits to overturn the election, and she is well-known now for losing every one of those lawsuits.  Also, she has been ordered to pay attorney's fees of the opposing party in at least one of those cases.

          Well, whoever it was going to be, this XO says that she would have all the resources at the disposal of the government still in power to do her duties as the Special Counsel of this XO.

          But that still leaves questions about the statutes they invoked, the district judge's order they kind of quoted, and the recount they did not come clean on....

To be continued ....  For a deeper dive into today's question, visit the article posted earlier today on Insurance Claims and Bad Faith Law Blog, https://insuranceclaimsbadfaith.typepad.com/insurance_claims_badfaith/2022/01/identifying-the-woman-their-xo-picked-for-special-counsel.html. 

Please read the disclaimer.  ©2022 Dennis J. Wall.  All rights reserved.

In earlier articles, here and here, we explored other questions about the draft Executive Order dated December 16, 2020 to seize the voting machines that were used to elect President Biden, Download Draft Executive Order dated December 16 2020.   We looked at the question of why the draft XO is written for the Secretary of Defense but not the Attorney General, and why it is written for the National Guard but not the Army.  We learned that the answer is the same in both cases:

Because they wouldn't do it.

          But there are more questions, including today's question:  Who is the person who would be appointed Special Counsel with full resources "necessary to carry out her duties" after the voting machines were seized?  And why did they need a Special Counsel after they seized the voting machines?

          They may have needed to appoint a Special Counsel because the Attorney General wouldn't do it.

          So let's explore the appointment by this order of a Special Counsel with all the resources "necessary to carry out her duties[.]"  These people never used "her" or "she" meaning to be inclusive of everyone, and it is unlikely that they started on "December 16, 2020."  This crowd would not be likely to talk about "her" unless they had a woman already in mind.

          One of their lawyers at the time would have been a natural to fill the Special Counsel job this document would make.  At the time, one was Cleta Mitchell and another was Sidney Powell.

          Two weeks after the XO was written, Cleta Mitchell was on the January 2nd telephone call when the former guy called Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to try to intimidate him and his Office to overturn the election in Georgia.  

          Sidney Powell was another lawyer they had available at the time.  Sidney Powell filed many lawsuits to overturn the election, and she is well-known now for losing every one of those lawsuits.  Also, she has been ordered to pay attorney's fees of the opposing party in at least one of those cases.

          Well, whoever it was going to be, this XO says that she would have all the resources at the disposal of the government still in power to do her duties as the Special Counsel of this XO.

          But that still leaves questions about the statutes they invoked, the district judge's order they kind of quoted, and the recount they did not come clean on....

To be continued ....  For a deeper dive into today's question, visit the article posted earlier today on Insurance Claims and Bad Faith Law Blog, https://insuranceclaimsbadfaith.typepad.com/insurance_claims_badfaith/2022/01/identifying-the-woman-their-xo-picked-for-special-counsel.html. 

Please read the disclaimer.  ©2022 Dennis J. Wall.  All rights reserved.

In earlier articles, here and here, we explored other questions about the draft Executive Order dated December 16, 2020 to seize the voting machines that were used to elect President Biden, Download Draft Executive Order dated December 16 2020.   We looked at the question of why the draft XO is written for the Secretary of Defense but not the Attorney General, and why it is written for the National Guard but not the Army.  We learned that the answer is the same in both cases:

Because they wouldn't do it.

          But there are more questions, including today's question:  Who is the person who would be appointed Special Counsel with full resources "necessary to carry out her duties" after the voting machines were seized?  And why did they need a Special Counsel after they seized the voting machines?

          They may have needed to appoint a Special Counsel because the Attorney General wouldn't do it.

          So let's explore the appointment by this order of a Special Counsel with all the resources "necessary to carry out her duties[.]"  These people never used "her" or "she" meaning to be inclusive of everyone, and it is unlikely that they started on "December 16, 2020."  This crowd would not be likely to talk about "her" unless they had a woman already in mind.

          One of their lawyers at the time would have been a natural to fill the Special Counsel job this document would make.  At the time, one was Cleta Mitchell and another was Sidney Powell.

          Two weeks after the XO was written, Cleta Mitchell was on the January 2nd telephone call when the former guy called Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to try to intimidate him and his Office to overturn the election in Georgia.  

          Sidney Powell was another lawyer they had available at the time.  Sidney Powell filed many lawsuits to overturn the election, and she is well-known now for losing every one of those lawsuits.  Also, she has been ordered to pay attorney's fees of the opposing party in at least one of those cases.

          Well, whoever it was going to be, this XO says that she would have all the resources at the disposal of the government still in power to do her duties as the Special Counsel of this XO.

          But that still leaves questions about the statutes they invoked, the district judge's order they kind of quoted, and the recount they did not come clean on....

To be continued ....  For a deeper dive into today's question, visit the article posted earlier today on Insurance Claims and Bad Faith Law Blog, https://insuranceclaimsbadfaith.typepad.com/insurance_claims_badfaith/2022/01/identifying-the-woman-their-xo-picked-for-special-counsel.html. 

Please read the disclaimer.  ©2022 Dennis J. Wall.  All rights reserved.