The recent behavior of Justice Alito and also of Justice Thomas lead people to reasonably question their impartiality. This is the first and overall reason for them to recuse themselves in pending cases under the federal recusal statute. 28 U.S.C.A. § 455(a).
Both of these gentlemen have involved their wives in their refusals to recuse themselves. But the federal statute says that they shall "also" recuse when they each know that he (in this case, they are both "he's") "his spouse ... has ... any other interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome[.]" 28 U.S.C.A. § 455 (b)(4). In my eyes, both of these gentlemen's statements are admissions that their respective spouses have an interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome in cases pending before them.
Time is urgent. The Supreme Court is going to issue its opinion in the immunity case and other insurrection-related cases any day now. Obviously, it would be better to have a recusal motion filed before any opinions are issued.
Since the lawyers for the United States have not filed a recusal motion, the people of the United States who reasonably question the impartiality of Justice Alito or Justice Thomas as judges in pending cases should make themselves heard. I have been EMailing and writing just that and I urge you to contact these lawyers as well. All it takes is to tell them that the recent behavior of Justices Alito and Thomas lead people to reasonably question their impartiality and that as lawyers with the United States for a client, these lawyers have an obligation to represent the best interests of their client and file a recusal motion now:
- In the case of Trump v. United States, the immunity case:
Jack L. Smith, Esquire, Special Counsel; et al.
Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Ave, NW
Washington, D.C. 20530-0001
[email protected]
- In the case of Fischer v. United States, one of the insurrection cases:
Elizabeth B. Prelogar, Esquire, Solicitor General; et al.
Department of Justice
Washington, D.C. 20530-0001
[email protected]
- Everyone else:
J.P. Cooney, Esquire, Deputy Special Counsel
Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Ave, NW
Washington, D.C. 20530-0001
[email protected]
This lawyer has been involved in many cases involving issues of integrity and he is a former Chief of the integrity section of the U.S. Attorney's Office for D.C.
Matthew M. Graves, Esquire
U.S. Attorney for D.C.
Denise Cheung, Chief of the Criminal Division,
U.S. Attorney's Office for D.C.
[email protected]
Liz Aloi, Esquire, Chief of the Public Corruption and
Civil Rights Section, U.S. Attorney's Office for D.C.
The mailing address for everyone at the U.S. Attorney's Office for D.C. is:
U.S. Attorney's Office for D.C.
601 D Street, NW
Washington, DC 20579
Finally, the name and mailing address of the current Solicitor General of the United States. She clerked for Merrick Garland when he was a judge:
Elizabeth B. Prelogar, Esquire, Solicitor General
Office of the Solicitor General
950 Pennsylvania Ave, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001
Please read the disclaimer. The contents of this blog article, exclusive of names and titles and addresses, © 2024 Dennis J. Wall. All rights reserved.
FTC AND DOJ SEEK INFO ON SERIAL ACQUISITIONS AND ROLL-UPS.
The Federal Trade Commission and the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice are asking for information again. Previously, both the FTC and the DOJ requested information regarding your experience in health care consolidations, mergers and acquisitions.
Their current Request is for Information for Public Comment on Corporate Consolidation Through Serial Acquisitions and Roll-Ups. It is a cousin to the previous request except that now they are requesting information from "all sectors and industries in the U.S. economy," to quote the FTC Press Release on May 23, 2024.
To quote the Federal Trade Commission's June 9, 2024 Weekly Digest Bulletin, and specifically the lead article by Henry Liu, Director of the FTC's Bureau of Competition: "You can play an important role in helping the antitrust agencies detect and deter serial acquisition strategies. If you have any experience with serial acquisitions – as a consumer, worker, supplier, business or otherwise --please consider sharing that experience with us by submitting a public comment." Your comments will help the antitrust enforcers understand how roll-up acquisition strategies can lead to "consolidation, higher prices, lower quality, or fewer choices for important products or services, leaving the American public worse off."
As Mr. Liu explained in his article in the FTC Weekly Digest Bulletin, by law acquisitive firms are only required to tell the regulators about larger deals where one business acquires another, i.e., deals involving $119.5 Million or more. Smaller deals fly under the radar. Thus the description of these deals as "serial acquisitions" in which an acquisitive business buys up or otherwise takes over other businesses, one after another. Private Equity firms are especially fond of this business strategy of serial acquisitions, and they generally call the strategy "roll-ups" because the PE firms roll up the competition by acquiring their competitors one business at a time.
The deadline to leave Comments in reply to this Request for Information is July 22, 2024. Share your experience and help us all with your knowledge!
You can link to the Docket for your Public Comments in the above quotation from Liu's article, or you can proceed to www.regulations.gov. You can leave your Comments for FTC-2024-0028, titled "FTC and DOJ Seek Info on Serial Acquisitions, Roll-Up Strategies Across U.S. Economy." It's as easy as that, but just keep in mind that once your Comments are submitted, they will be posted to Regulations.gov where they will be available to the FTC, the DOJ, and the public.
Please read the disclaimer. ©2024 Dennis J. Wall. All rights reserved.
Posted by Dennis J. Wall on June 12, 2024 at 05:56 AM in Comments on Proposed Rules | Permalink | Comments (0)
Tags: #AntitrustDivision, #DepartmentOfJustice, #FederalTradeCommission, #PrivateEquity Firms, #RequestForInformation, #Roll-Ups, #SerialAcquisitions