Six lawyers on the U.S. Supreme Court have given immunity to "official" crimes of a president but not to "unofficial" ones.
They did not try to say why crimes committed in an official capacity are not crimes. They won't even say what "official" crimes or "unofficial" crimes there may be. Rather, they have left it to Trial Judge Tanya Chutkan to do that if she follows their guidelines.
This is not the first time they have tried to tell a woman what to do.
Well, the woman in this case is a Trial Judge. I am a lawyer who has from time to time appeared in court in trials, which differentiates me, I believe, from most or all of the six lawyers who voted to have Judge Chutkan do their dirty work and decide what after all is "immunized" and "what's not."
Judge, every single thing charged in the indictment is "unofficial" and not immunized. Leading a gang to overturn the government is never an "official" act.
So like the jury in the New York case that read out 34 guilty verdicts, one after the other, so read out each alleged crime here, whatever the number of crimes that are alleged in the Grand Jury's indictment. Read them out one by one. Read out each and every crime alleged in the indictment and rule that the Special Prosecutor can prosecute it here. Let a jury decide.
When your ruling is appealed yet again in what seems to be an endless number of appeals, let the Six on the Supreme Court do some work here after all. They will go to work on your ruling whatever you may rule. So give them something to work on, Judge, if it comes to that.
Do not call BS here, even if it's telling it like it is. Instead, call truth.
Please read the disclaimer. ©2024 Dennis J. Wall. All rights reserved.
Comments